Better Left Unheard

We live in a voyeuristic society. One that is becoming more invasive by the day. And a disturbing trend has begun that feeds into that voyeurism: the releasing of 911 tapes after a violent crime. From OJ Simpson to 9-11… Jon Benet Ramsey, Casey Anthony, Mel Gibson, Whitney Houston, Trayvon Martin… suddenly we the public feel entitled to hear the terror, the desperation, the immediacy of the call.

What can be gained by hearing these calls? We know the call was made, we know police responded, we know the outcome because it’s plastered all over the news. But do we really need to hear someone desperately screaming that someone else is being murdered right in front of them?

This has been on my mind for a while, probably since the OJ tapes were released – that’s the first one that I can remember. But it was brought back up just this morning, when I found out that the tape of a local murder/suicide was released. This crime happened in a town very close to me, the call was routed through my own county’s dispatch center. The call has been all over the news for the last few days. Local people – three families – are intimately involved, and many, many people from my town and surrounding communities know these families intimately. This crime rocked our safe little world.

But it happened more than a month ago. News outlets tout the call as “revealing new details” about the crime. Unless you consider anguished screams and a possibly rude dispatcher “new details”, nothing new was discovered. The victim is still dead. Her shooter is still dead. And we could have been told that the gun was purchased illegally without forcing the families to relive the horror.

And on the other side of it, is this new practice of ‘outing’ everything in an emergency situation going to start to have a backlash? Are people going to start thinking twice before placing a call for help? Are they going to start withholding information from dispatchers for fear that it might be misconstrued when the public listens? Case in point: our local situation. I have not heard the tape, I won’t listen out of principle. But others who have are saying that the dispatcher was “cold,” “rude,” and “unprofessional”. That there were pauses in the tape. But it’s possible that she was talking with emergency personnel during those pauses. It is possible that she is trained to remain absolutely unemotional, which is vital when you’re dealing with a severely traumatized and out-of-control individual. But there are now people calling for her dismissal because they are third-party listeners, a month after the fact, playing Armchair Quarterback.

I don’t often say “there oughtta be a law” and mean it, but this time? There oughtta be a law that says that the press cannot release 911 tapes. It’s one thing to play them in court, especially if they hold vital evidence. But there is no reason, beyond prurience, to release this stuff to the general public.

This entry was posted in 911 and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Better Left Unheard

  1. Joy says:

    This makes me really sad. Some of the tapes I’ve heard are just screaming and crying. Really, what’s the point?

  2. skl1 says:

    I agree. For one thing, this kind of thing can easily prevent an accused from having a fair trial, so it should be illegal for the cops to share it in the first place.

    Equally bad is the way the media uses people’s suffering to make money – the more “sensational” the better. I don’t know if that’s something we can legislate against, and I have no hope of the media ever developing enough conscience to stop it. Also, perplexing as it is, there seem to be a lot of people who want more and more of that stuff. Is it human nature? I don’t get it.

    Yesterday I was looking for something on YouTube and for some unknown reason, a lot of memorial videos of miscarried babies and dead children came up. Curiosity got the best of me and I looked at a few of them. Some of them were rather graphic and certainly very personal. Based on the comments, it seems some people get a kick out of watching and commenting (often crassly) on this stuff. Personally I don’t understand posting something like that on YouTube for the whole world to consume as the fancy strikes them. But apparently I’m behind the times.

    I do think you’re right about people calling 911 and thinking this is going to be all over the news. On one hand it could make people hold back information, but on the other hand, it could encourage them to exaggerate to get attention, or even lie to get someone in trouble. And considering that these often have something to do with medical emergencies, aren’t people entitled to privacy? I mean, if you called the doctor and said the exact same thing, the doctor could not make any of that public or even share it with your next of kin without your permission. Also, if you make a formal statement to police, I don’t think they will publicize it while still investigating or trying a case, if ever. But 911 is a freakin’ soap opera? How does this seem right to anyone?

  3. Joy says:

    I find it hard to believe that nobody had anything to add to this.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s